Athena International Publishing relies on peer review for all its publications to uphold the quality and validity of published work. All proposals for proceedings to be published in this series are first evaluated by the Series Editor(s) and by our Content Selection and Advisory Committee (CSAC) consisting of senior researchers in the relevant field. If a proposal is accepted, the peer review process for the individual articles within each proceedings is the responsibility of the conference organizers and the Volume Editor(s) of the proceedings, who are required by Athena to conduct the peer review process in line with international scientific standards.
As such, the peer review type (single-blind, double-blind, triple-blind, open) can be different from one proceedings to another. Please refer to the individual proceedings page and/or the conference website for details on this. Note that once the accepted papers have been submitted to the publisher, the Athena Editorial Office conducts various additional checks (technical, scope, plagiarism, etc.) and the Series Editor(s) perform(s) a final check on the scientific quality of the articles before approving them for production. For more information about peer review in general, please refer to our Peer Review policy.
